The One in Five Campaign https://www.oneinfive.scot Encourage and empower Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:43:54 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 DISABLED PEOPLE UNTITE AGAINST STARBUCKS’ PLASTIC STRAW BAN https://www.oneinfive.scot/disabled-people-untite-against-starbucks-plastic-straw-ban/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/disabled-people-untite-against-starbucks-plastic-straw-ban/#respond Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:26:26 +0000 https://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=349 PRESS RELEASE (EMBARGO 00.01am BST on Thursday 23rd August)

Attention: News desks

PRESS RELEASE

DISABLED PEOPLE UNITE AGAINST STARBUCKS’ PLASTIC STRAW BAN

GLOBAL COALITION OF DISABILITY ORGANISATIONS SUPPORT ‘ONE IN FIVE’

 

Disability organisations representing over 500,000 disabled people in Europe and North America have thrown their weight behind a letter to Starbucks CEO, Kevin Johnson, coordinated by Scottish disability rights organization One in Five.

In their letter, co-signed by Baroness Tanni Grey-Thomson and political representatives from every major UK political party, One in Five states that Starbucks’ intention to eliminate single-use plastic straws globally by 2020 has caused ‘consider anxiety’ and led to many disabled people feeling excluded by the world’s largest coffee chain.

The campaigners have challenged Starbucks to invest in the research and development of a new straw that will satisfy environmentalists and disabled people.

On release of the letter, One in Five co-founder, Jamie Szymkowiak, said:

“Our letter shows the strength of feeling from disabled people around the world. Starbucks must listen to their customers, including disabled people and environmentalists, and commit to investing in the research and development of a straw that doesn’t harm the environment for future generations and ensures the needs of disabled people are met.”

One in Five co-Founder, Pam Duncan-Glancy added:

“Starbucks have the power to help disabled people and the environment at the same time. Big companies like them can lead and others follow. It’s so important for our human rights that they act now. After all, what is environmental justice without social justice?”

Commenting on release of the letter, Louise Edge, senior oceans campaigner at Greenpeace UK, said:

“The companies responsible for distributing masses of single-use plastic items have the resources to innovate products which are truly sustainable and fully fit for purpose – suitable for everyone including the disabled community. Straws and other throwaway plastic items, that can’t be easily recycled, must be phased out and replaced with alternatives that don’t pollute our oceans and are suitable for everyone. In the meantime, plastic straws should be easily available for those who need them.”

 

-END-

 

Letter to Kevin Johnson below

 

One in Five

@oneinfivescot http://www.oneinfive.scot

Notable signatories

One in Five contact: Jamie Szymkowiak +447734392582

Greenpeace contact: Alexandra Sedgwick, Press Officer: alexandra.sedgwick@greenpeace.org

 

 

————————————-

Kevin Johnson

President & CEO

Starbucks Coffee Company

22 August 2018

 

Dear Mr. Johnson

Plastic Straws for Disabled People

It has been just over one month since your announcement of Starbucks’ intention to eliminate single-use plastic straws globally by 2020[1] caused considerable anxiety among the disabled community. Furthermore, the ambiguous follow-up statement[2] has done little to reduce these concerns and has led to many disabled people feeling excluded by the world’s largest coffee chain.

One in Five have been working since the start of this year to bring the needs of disabled people to the public’s attention in the plastic straw debate. The average plastic straw is cheap, flexible, can be used for drinking cold and hot beverages, and is readily available. For some disabled people these attributes are vital for independent living. It’s worth pointing out that the umbrella of ‘disability’ includes people with different needs and impairments, and that it’s the universal accessibility of the plastic straw that makes so many disabled people anxious about an outright ban.

As you may be aware, most paper and plant-based alternatives are not flexible or suitable for drinks over 40C (104F). Not only does a soggy straw result in a poor customer experience, the deterioration increases the risks of choking, as some of us take longer to drink. Hard straws, made from metal for example, act as heat conductors and present obvious dangers for disabled people who cannot control their bite or who have neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s. Reusable plastic straws present hygiene concerns to people with specific health conditions and can be very difficult to clean.

It’s not acceptable to have straws ‘available on request’ for disabled customers. This is unnecessary gatekeeping that contributes to feelings of guilt for wanting to enjoy – or needing – a drink. Nor is it acceptable for non-disabled people to expect disabled people to carry a straw everywhere we go just in case we get thirsty. Passing yet another cost onto disabled people isn’t suitable if you accept that society bears a responsibility to make the world more accessible for everyone. After all, environmental justice without social justice isn’t justice at all.

Starbucks have a successful track record when it comes to access and disability inclusion: where your organization leads, others follow. Unfortunately the straw debate is no different, as local coffee shops across Europe and North America abandon plastic straws without considering the needs of disabled people. However, you’re in a position to change that.

It is our view that the only solution that will rid our oceans, beaches and parks of unnecessary single-use plastics and meet the needs of disabled people is for organizations such as Starbucks to invest in the research and development of a new straw that is accessible for everyone, including non-disabled people.

Our question is simple. Will you work with us, and disabled people around the world, by committing to sourcing an environmentally friendly solution that meets our needs?

This letter has been co-signed by disabled people’s organizations, disability charities, notable disabled commentators and political representatives from across Europe and North America.

We look forward to your response.

 

Jamie Szymkowiak and Pam Duncan-Glancy

One in Five

www.oneinfive.scot

 

 

 

Disabled People’s Organizations & Charities

Center for Disability Rights

Inclusion London

National Disability Rights Network

Glasgow Disability Alliance

Facial Palsy UK

Inclusion Scotland

Ruderman Family Foundation

Raul Krauthausen, Founder of wheelmap.org, on behalf of Ability Watch

Michel Arriens on behalf of BKMF e.V.

Disability Agenda Scotland

  • Action on Hearing Loss Scotland
  • Capability Scotland
  • ENABLE Scotland
  • RNIB Scotland
  • SAMH
  • Sense Scotland

Embla Guðrúnar Ágústsdóttir and Freyja Haraldsdóttir, co-Founders, on behalf of Tabú

Health & Social Care Scotland (The ALLIANCE)

Cumbria Down’s Syndrome Support Group

WOW Campaign

Alice Wong, Founder and Director, Disability Visibility Project

Ian Langtree, Director, on behalf of Disabled World

People First (Scotland)

 

Notable disability rights activists and political representatives

Baroness Tanni Grey Thomson

Jeremy Balfour MSP, Conservative Party

Johann Lamont MSP, Labour Party

George Adam MSP, Scottish National Party (SNP)

Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP, Liberal Democrats

Alison Johnstone MSP, Scottish Green Party

Míriam Nogueras, VP of the Catalan Democrats (PDeCAT) and MP in the Spanish Congress

Robert Gale, Artistic Director, Birds of Paradise Theatre Company

Debra Torrance, on behalf of Ungagged

Cllr Dennis Robertson

Cllr Robert Mooney

Sandra Webster, on behalf of the SSP Disability Network

Susan Douglas-Scott, Chair of Independent Living Fund

 

Trade Unions

Community

UNISON

Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC)

[1] https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-eliminate-plastic-straws-globally-by-2020

[2] https://news.starbucks.com/views/follow-up-to-starbucks-sustainability-news

 

 

Translations of the Letter

 Plastik-Strohhalme für Menchen mit Behinderung

 Pailles en plastique pour les personnes handicapées

 Pajitas de plástico para discapacitados

 Canyetes de plàstic per a persones amb discapacitat 

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/disabled-people-untite-against-starbucks-plastic-straw-ban/feed/ 0
Canyetes de plàstic per a persones amb discapacitat https://www.oneinfive.scot/canyetes-de-plastic-per-a-persones-amb-discapacitat/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/canyetes-de-plastic-per-a-persones-amb-discapacitat/#respond Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:11:37 +0000 https://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=354 Kevin Johnson

President i CEO

Starbucks Coffee Company

 

Benvolgut Sr. Johnson,

Canyetes de plàstic per a persones amb discapacitat

Fa un mes des que el seu anunci de la intenció d’Starbucks d’eliminar les canyetes de plàstic d’un sol ús de tots els seus establiments arreu del món abans de l’any 2020[1]va causar certa preocupació en el si del col·lectiu de persones amb discapacitat. L’ambigüitat del posterior comunicat[2]ha fet poc per reduir aquestes inquietuds i ha portat a que moltes persones amb discapacitat s’hagin sentit excloses per part de la cadena de cafè més important del món.

Des de One in Five hem estat treballant des de l’inici d’aquest any per tal de traslladar les necessitats del col·lectiu de persones amb discapacitat al debat públic sobre les canyetes de plàstic. La canyeta de plàstic mitjana és econòmica, flexible, pot ser utilitzada per beure tant begudes fredes com calentes, i és fàcilment accessible. Per a algunes persones amb discapacitat aquests atributs són vitals per la seva independència de vida. Val la pena assenyalar que l’espectre de ‘discapacitat’ inclou gent amb diferents necessitats i transtorns, i que és precisament la accessibilitat universal de les canyetes de plàstic el que fa que tantes persones amb discapacitat estiguin preocupades sobre aquesta prohibició.

Com deu saber, la majoria d’alternatives de paper i basades en material vegetal no són flexibles o adequades per a begudes de més de 40ºC. Una canyeta que absorveixi líquid no només resulta en una experiència del client pobra, el deteriorament incrementa també el risc d’ofec, ja que alguns de nosaltres tardem més en beure. Les canyetes dures, fetes de metall per exemple, actuen com a conductors de calor i presenten perills obvis per a persones amb discapacitat que no puguin controlar la força de la seva mossegada o que tinguin trastorns neurològics com el Parkinson. Les canyetes de plàstic reutilitzables presenten problemes associats amb la higiene per a persones amb transtorns de salut específics, i poden ser difícils de netejar.

No trobem acceptable tenir canyetes ‘disponibles a petició’ per a clients amb discapacitat. Això constituiria un obstacle innecessari que contribuiria al sentiment de culpabilitat que moltes persones amb discapacitat que volen gaudir – o necessiten – una beguda. Tampoc trobem acceptable per part de persones que no pateixen d’una discapacitat, que esperin que les persones amb discapacitat portin sempre amb elles una canyeta allà on anem per si de cas tenim sed. Traspassar un altre cost extra, addicional als ja existents, a les peresones amb discapacitat no és acceptable si volem creure que la societat té la responsabilitat de fer que el món sigui més accessible per a tothom. Si la justícia mediambiental no compta amb la justícia social, deixa de ser justícia.

Starbucks té un historial satisfactori pel que fa a accessibilitat i a inclusió: sovint, els altres segueixen el que vostès fan. Desafortunadament, el cas del debat sobre la canyeta no és diferent als altres, ja que sovint cafès locals arreu d’Europa i l’Amèrica del Nord abandonen les canyetes de plàstic sense considerar les necessitats de les persones amb discapacitat. Malgrat això, vostès estan en una posició que els permet canviar això.

Creiem que la única solució que pot permetre que aconseguim aturar la contaminació d’oceans, platges i parcs, d’innecessàries canyetes de plàstic d’un sol ús, sorgeix de que organitzacions com ara Starbucks inverteixin en la investigació i desenvolupament de noves canyetes accessibles per a tothom, incloent aquelles persones que no pateixen una discapacitat.

La nostra pregunta és simple. ¿Treballaran amb nosaltres i les persones amb discapacitat d’arreu del món i es comprometran a proporcionar una solució respectuosa amb el medi ambient i que cobreixi les nostres necessitats?

Aquesta carta ha estat firmada per organitzacions de persones amb discapacitat, organitzacions benèfiques per a discapacitats, persones amb discapacitat influents i representants polítics d’arreu d’Europa i l’Amèrica del Nord.

Esperem amb interès la seva resposta.

 

Jamie Szymkowiak and Pam Duncan-Glancy

One in Five

 

www.oneinfive.scot

[1]                https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-eliminate-plastic-straws-globally-by-2020

[2]                https://news.starbucks.com/views/follow-up-to-starbucks-sustainability-news

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/canyetes-de-plastic-per-a-persones-amb-discapacitat/feed/ 0
Pajitas de plástico para discapacitados https://www.oneinfive.scot/pajitas-de-plastico-para-discapacitados/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/pajitas-de-plastico-para-discapacitados/#respond Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:11:19 +0000 https://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=360 Kevin Johnson

Presidente y consejero delegado

Starbucks Coffee Company

 

Estimado Sr. Johnson,

Pajitas de plástico para discapacitados

Ha pasado poco más de un mes desde que usted emitiese su comunicado relacionado con la intención de Starbucks de eliminar las pajitas de plástico de un solo uso para el año 2020. Este comunicado fue fuente de una cantidad considerable de ansiedad entre la comunidad de discapacitados. Además, el comunicado que se emitió a continuación, de naturaleza considerablemente ambigua, no ha ayudado lo suficiente para mitigar estas preocupaciones y ha llevado a que muchos discapacitados se sientas excluidos por la mayor empresa de café del mundo.

La iniciativa One in Five(traducido al Español como “uno de cada cinco”) ha trabajado desde comienzos de este año para poner de relieve las necesidades de los discapacitados ante el público en general, acerca del debate sobre las pajitas de plástico. La pajita de plástico común es barata, flexible y se puede usar tanto como para beber bebidas frías como bebidas calientes, aparte de ser de muy fácil acceso. Para algunos discapacitados, estas características son de vital importancia para llevar una vida de forma independiente. Merece la pena señalar que bajo el término genérico “discapacidad” se incluyen muchas personas con diferentes necesidades y dificultades. Por esta razón, el debate sobre la accesibilidad universal de las pajitas de plástico y su prohibición total causa muchos niveles de ansiedad a este grupo de población.

Es posible de que sea consciente de que la mayoría de alternativas, como por ejemplo pajitas de papel u otros materiales hechos de plantas, no son flexibles ni adecuadas para bebidas con una temperatura superior a 40C (104F). El resultado es una pajita de una textura húmeda y blanda lo cual lleva a una experiencia muy negativa para el consumidor. Además, su deterioro aumenta el riesgo de ahogo, ya que a muchos de nosotros nos lleva más tiempo consumir estos productos. Las pajitas duras, hechas de metal, por ejemplo, funcionan como conductores del calor y presentan riesgos evidentes para los discapacitados que no pueden control la forma en la que muerden las pajitas, o quienes tienen afecciones neurológicas como el mal de Parkinson. Por otra parte, las pajitas de plástico reusable presentan una serie de preocupaciones sanitarias específicas a personas con condiciones médicas particulares y pueden ser muy difíciles de limpiar.

No es admisible que haya pajitas “disponibles bajo petición” para consumidores discapacitados. Esto es una barrera innecesaria que contribuye a ocasionar sentimientos de culpa por querer disfrutar (o necesitar) una bebida. Es igualmente inaceptable que los consumidores no discapacitados esperen que nosotros, los discapacitados, carguemos con una pajita a todos los sitios en caso de que nos entre sed. Cobrar un coste adicional a los discapacitados tampoco es adecuado si se tiene en cuenta que la sociedad conlleva la responsabilidad de hacer que el mundo sea más accesible para todo el mundo. Al fin y al cabo, la justicia medio ambiental sin justicia social no es justicia en absoluto.

Starbucks tiene un historial impecable en lo que se refiere a accesibilidad e inclusión de los discapacitados: allá donde su organización dirija, otros seguirán. Desgraciadamente el debate sobre las pajitas no se queda indiferente, ya que cafeterías locales por toda Europa y Norte-América ya han abandonado las pajitas de plástico sin tener en cuenta las necesidades de los discapacitados. Sin embargo, usted está en una posición para cambiar esta situación.

Creemos firmemente que la única solución para eliminar la presencia de los plásticos de un solo uso en los océanos, playas y parques, además de cubrir las necesidades de los discapacitados es que organizaciones como Starbucks inviertan en la investigación y el desarrollo de una nueva pajita que sea accesible para todo el mundo, incluyendo los consumidores no-discapacitados.

La pregunta que le presentamos en sencilla. ¿Trabajará con nosotros y con los discapacitados de todo el mundo, comprometiéndose a proporcionar una solución respetuosa con el medio ambiente y que cubra nuestras necesidades?

Organizaciones de discapacitados, organizaciones benéficas para discapacitados, personas influyentes discapacitadas y representantes políticos a lo largo de Europa y Norte-América han firmado esta carta.

Esperamos con interés su respuesta.

 

Jamie Szymkowiak y Pam Duncan-Glancy

One in Five

www.oneinfive.scot

 

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/pajitas-de-plastico-para-discapacitados/feed/ 0
Plastik-Strohhalme für Menchen mit Behinderung https://www.oneinfive.scot/plastik-strohhalme-fur-menchen-mit-behinderung/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/plastik-strohhalme-fur-menchen-mit-behinderung/#respond Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:10:22 +0000 https://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=358 Kevin Johnson

President & CEO

Starbucks Coffee Company

 

 

Sehr geehrter Herr Johnson

Plastik-Strohhalme für Menchen mit Behinderung

Es ist bereits länger als einen Monat her, dass Starbucks sein Vorhaben angekündigt hat, bis 2020[1]weltweit auf den Einsatz von Einweg-Plastik-Strohhalmen zu verzichten. Dieses Vorhaben verursachte große Sorgen in der in der Gruppe der Menschen mit Behinderung. Auch die anschließende mehrdeutige Stellungnahme[2]hat wenig zur Beruhigung der Betroffenen beigetragen, sondern führte dazu, dass sich Menschen mit Behinderung von der weltweit führenden Kaffee-Kette ausgeschlossen fühlen.

Seit Beginn des Jahres macht die Initiative One in Five auf die Bedürfnisse von Menschen mit Behinderung in dieser Debatte aufmerksam. Der durchschnittliche Plastik-Strohhalm ist günstig, flexibel und wird zum Verzehr von kalten und warmen Getränken genutzt und ist jederzeit leicht verfügbar. Für viele Menschen mit Behinderung sind diese Eigenschaften essentiell für ein selbstbestimmtes Leben. Es ist wichtig herauszustreichen, dass der Oberbegriff „Behinderung“, Menschen mit vielen verschiedenen Bedürfnissen und Beeinträchtigungen zusammenfasst, für welche die weltweite Verfügbarkeit von Plastik-Strohhalmen grundlegend wichtig ist und das völlige Verbot zu großen Ängsten führt.

Wie Sie sicherlich wissen, viele Alternativen aus Papier oder organischen Materialien sind nicht flexibel und nicht für den Verzehr von Getränken über 40 °C (104F) geeignet. Nicht nur, dass durchweichte Strohhalme unangenehm im Gebrauch sind, sie erhöhen auch das Risiko sich gerade bei einem langsamen Verzehr zu verschlucken. Strohhalme aus festem Material, wie zum Beispiel Metall, fungieren nicht nur als Wärmeleiter, sondern stellen auch eine Gefahr für Menschen dar, die ihren Beißreflex nicht kontrollieren können oder neurologische Erkrankungen haben, wie beispielsweise Parkinson. Wiederverwendbare Strohhalme stellen aus Hygienesicht ein Problem dar, da sie oft schwierig zu reinigen sind.

Es ist nicht akzeptabel Strohhalme nur auf Anfrage für Kunden mit Behinderung zur Verfügung zu stellen. Dies ist ein unnötiger Stolperstein auf dem Weg zum gewünschten oder benötigten Verzehr und lässt ein Schuldgefühl bei den Betroffenen entstehen, um etwas bitten zu müssen. Auch ist es nicht akzeptabel für Menschen ohne Behinderung zu erwarten, dass Menschen mit Behinderung immer einen Strohhalm dabei haben, für den Fall, dass sie unterwegs einmal durstig sein sollten. Menschen mit Behinderung somit einen weiteren Kostenfaktor zuzumuten, schränkt weltweit den Zugang zum öffentlichen Raum zusehends ein. Umweltbewusstsein ohne die soziale Gerechtigkeit zu berücksichtigen ist demzufolge keine wirkliche Gerechtigkeit.

Starbucks hat eine beachtliche Erfolgsgeschichte, wenn es zur Teilhabe und Inklusion kommt: Wo das eigene Unternehmen vorangeht, werden Andere folgen. Starbucks macht da keinen Unterschied in der Strohhalm- Debatte, lokale Cafés in Europa und Nordamerika verbannen Plastik-Strohhalme ohne die Bedürfnisse von Menschen mit Behinderungen zu berücksichtigen.

Sie sind in der Position dies zu beeinflussen.

Die einzige Lösung, die Meere, Strände und Grünflächen von unnötigen Plastik-Strohhalmen zu befreien und gleichzeitig die Bedürfnisse von Menschen mit Behinderungen zu wahren, kann unserer Ansicht nach nur sein, dass Starbucks in die Forschung und Entwicklung von Alternativen investiert und Strohhalme für Menschen mit und ohne Behinderung zur Verfügung stellt.

Unsere Frage ist einfach: Werden Sie mit uns zusammenarbeiten, um eine umweltfreundliche Alternative zu finden, die die Bedürfnisse von Menschen mit Behinderungen weltweit berücksichtigen?

Dieser Brief wurde unterzeichnet von Interessenverbänden von Menschen mit Behinderungen, Wohltätigkeitsorganisationen, bekannten Interessenvertretern und Politikern aus Europa und Nord Amerika.

Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Antwort.

 

Jamie Szymkowiak + Pam Duncan-Glancy

One in Five

www.oneinfive.scot

 

[1] https://news.starbucks.com/press-releases/starbucks-to-eliminate-plastic-straws-globally-by-2020

[2]https://news.starbucks.com/views/follow-up-to-starbucks-sustainability-news

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/plastik-strohhalme-fur-menchen-mit-behinderung/feed/ 0
Pailles en plastique pour les personnes handicapées https://www.oneinfive.scot/pailles-en-plastique-pour-les-personnes-handicapees/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/pailles-en-plastique-pour-les-personnes-handicapees/#respond Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:09:03 +0000 https://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=356 Kevin Johnson

President & CEO

Starbucks Coffee Company

 

 

Monsieur le Président,

Sujet: pailles en plastique pour les personnes handicapées

Il y a tout juste un mois vous indiquiez que l’intention de Starbucks d’éliminer les pailles en plastique à usage unique d’ici 2020 à échelle mondiale avait créé une préoccupation importante parmi la communauté des personnes handicapées. De plus, le propos ci-dessous n’a pu apporter beaucoup de réponses à ces préoccupations et a laissé chez de nombreuses personnes handicapées le sentiment qu’elles étaient exclues par la plus grande chaine de café au monde.

Depuis le début d’année, One in Five a œuvré à mettre en évidence aux yeux du public les besoins des personnes handicapées concernant le débat sur les pailles en plastique. Une paille en plastique est bon marché, peut être utilisée tant avec une boisson chaude que froide et est toujours facilement disponible.

Pour certaines personnes handicapées, ces caractéristiques sont vitales lorsqu’il s’agit de pouvoir vivre et rester indépendant. Notons ici que par “personnes handicapées” nous voulons parler de personnes ayants différents besoins et déficiences et que c’est l’accessibilité pour tous aux pailles en plastique à l’idée d’une interdiction pure et simple qui nous inquiète.

Comme vous le savez probablement, la plupart des solutions alternatives à base de papier ou autres ne sont ni flexibles ni appropriées aux boissons chaudes au-dessus de 40°C. Boire avec une paille qui se détrempe et se détériore n’est non seulement pas pratique mais représente aussi un danger d’étouffement pour les handicapés lents à boire. Les pailles dures, celles en métal par exemple, conduisent hélas la chaleur et constituent un danger évident pour les personnes handicapées qui ne peuvent contrôler leur morsure ou bien qui ont des problèmes neurologiques comme la maladie de Parkinson. Les pailles réutilisables en plastique présentent un risque hygiénique pour les personnes atteintes de certains handicaps et peuvent être difficiles à nettoyer.

Il n’est pas acceptable d’avoir des pailles “à la demande” pour clients handicapés. Cela contribuerait à un sentiment de culpabilité de vouloir consommer – ou bien d’avoir simplement besoin – d’une boisson. Il n’est pas non plus acceptable pour les personnes bien portantes d’attendre des personnes handicapées qu’elles portent inlassablement avec elles une paille au cas où elles auraient soif. Faire supporter un nouveau coût aux handicapés n’est pas acceptable si l’on accepte l’idée que l’on doit rendre le monde plus accessible à tous et à chacun. On ne peut promouvoir de développement durable sans justice sociale.

Starbucks a fait ses preuves en matière de d’accès et d’inclusion des personnes handicapées : là où votre organisation ouvre la voie, d’autres suivent. Malheureusement le débat concernant les pailles est identique. Les cafés européens et américains abandonnent les pailles en plastique sans prendre en considération les besoins des personnes handicapées. Cependant, vous êtes en mesure de changer cela.

Nous croyons que la seule solution qui débarrassera nos océans, nos plages et nos parcs des plastiques inutiles à usage unique tout en répondant aux besoins des personnes handicapées consiste pour des organisations comme Starbucks à investir dans la recherche et développement d’un nouveau type de paille qui soit accessible à tous, y compris aux personnes bien portantes.

Notre question est simple. Travaillerez-vous avec nous, et les personnes handicapées du monde, en vous engageant à chercher une solution écologique viable qui réponde à nos besoins ?

Cette lettre a été co-signée par des organisations de personnes handicapées, des organisations caritatives pour des personnes handicapées, des handicapés notables et des représentants politiques de toute l’Amérique du Nord et d’Europe.

Dans l’attente de votre réponse, nous vous prions de bien vouloir agréer, Monsieur le Président, l’expression de nos respectueuses salutations.

 

Jamie Szymkowiak and Pam Duncan-Glancy

One in Five

www.oneinfive.scot

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/pailles-en-plastique-pour-les-personnes-handicapees/feed/ 0
Higher Education and Disability https://www.oneinfive.scot/higher-education-and-disability/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/higher-education-and-disability/#respond Wed, 28 Mar 2018 05:24:34 +0000 http://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=344 When I think about higher education and disability, I think about something the inspirational Professor Stephen Hawking once said. He advised people with disabilities to “concentrate on things your disability doesn’t prevent you doing well, and don’t regret the things it interferes with”. These are wise words.

The Open University aims to enable all our students, including those with disabilities or health conditions, to realise their ambitions and fulfil their potential through engaging in higher education. Our vision is to reach more people with life-changing learning that meets their needs. We are open to people, places, methods and ideas – anyone can study with us, anywhere, through our innovative approach to teaching and learning, and our willingness to embrace new technologies and thinking.

Contextualised admission is a hot topic in Scottish higher education at the moment: how can we ensure that university admissions processes take account not just of the qualifications potential student has acquired, but their background, their experience, their skills, and – perhaps most importantly – ensure that their potential is not overlooked? This is where the Open University’s open access policy is unique. If you would like to study with us, we would like to try to help you to achieve your potential – whoever you are and wherever you are starting from.

The proportion of new undergraduates with a declared disability at The Open University in Scotland rose from 14% in 2012/13 to 19% in 2016/17 and, for continuing undergraduates, from 17% in 2012/13 to 23% in 2016/17. That means that in 2016/17, 21% – one in five – of our now almost 16,000 students in Scotland told us they have a disability. This in turn enables us to assess their needs and work together to identify how we can best provide support – where that’s necessary.

Perhaps one reason for the high proportion of students with disabilities studying at The Open University in Scotland is that we bring university to the student – rather than requiring them to go to university. That can be a challenge for lots of reasons, including for those with, for example, anxiety issues or mobility difficulties.

Maybe another reason is that at the OU we have almost 50 years of experience of supporting students who have a lot going on in their lives: be that work, family or other caring responsibilities, disabilities or health conditions. Our associate lecturers and support teams are experienced in helping people to overcome barriers – whatever they may be – to achieve their learning goals. Like the proverbial stick of rock, a commitment to social justice runs through The Open University, and this is demonstrated day-in, day-out by the commitment of our staff.

Our experience demonstrates that dreaming, believing and engaging in higher education can lead individuals to achieve remarkable outcomes. An outstanding example is Sheila, from Motherwell, who graduated last year. An accident at work means she now uses a wheelchair and she has experienced anxiety and depression.  As a student, she was elected Chair of The OU’s Disabled Students’ Group.  She extended support for other students with disabilities by setting up a Facebook support group. A great role model for others.

We know a lot of good work is happening across the sector – but none of us can afford to be complacent.  At The Open University across the UK we are committed to reducing the completion gap that currently exists between students with a disability and the whole student population.

Disability is a protected characteristic under equalities legislation, but I would argue that as higher education providers we have a moral obligation to ensure that anyone with the potential to benefit from higher education can do so. As a number of OU students prepare to compete for Scotland in the Gold Coast, in para-sport and otherwise, perhaps in this Paralympic and Commonwealth Games year it’s a good time to reflect on what “going for gold” means in the context of supporting students with disabilities.

Shona Littlejohn is Depute Director, Student Experience and Widening Access, at The Open University in Scotland.

 

 

 

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/higher-education-and-disability/feed/ 0
In Conclusion… https://www.oneinfive.scot/in-conclusion/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/in-conclusion/#respond Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:16:15 +0000 http://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=326 One in Five has decided to conclude our campaign.

We at One in Five are immensely proud of what we achieved as a non-funded, grassroots, cross-party political campaign.

Did the campaign succeed? Yes and no. Ultimately we haven’t seen a significant increase in the numbers of disabled people in elected office but when we started this campaign, we knew that would take time.

Nevertheless, we belive there has been a notable increase in disabled people seeking elected office and participating in politics, which will lead to our Councillors, MSPs and MPs of the future.

One of our biggest successes was contributing to the campaign that led to the creation of the Access to Elected Office Fund (Scotland). It supported many disabled candidates at this year’s local elections and has already been guaranteed for the next Scottish Parliament election in 2021.

We’d also like to think that Scotland’s major political parties are more aware of the needs of disabled when accessing politics: accessible venues and manifestos, for example.

Those involved in One in Five will take the aims on in their own way, but as a coordinated campaign, One in Five has accomplished enough to conclude.

Thank you to the disabled activists who contributed to our blogs, shared and retweeted our posts. Thank you to all the Disabled People’s Organisations and to Stephen Daisley, Angela Haggerty, Ian Hamilton and others for shining a light on our wee campaign.

If you are a disabled person and would like to find out more about the Access to Elected Office Fund, please contact Inclusion Scotland http://inclusionscotland.org

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/in-conclusion/feed/ 0
Postcode Lottery https://www.oneinfive.scot/postcode-lottery/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/postcode-lottery/#respond Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:27:48 +0000 http://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=323 A few years ago the phrase Postcode Lottery was used almost continuously to describe the differences between health care from one area to another. A few weeks ago I found out for myself that this is still unfortunately fairly accurate.

For the last couple of years I’ve had occasional issues with my hip due to a condition I was born with however two months ago it blew up to levels I had not experiences. Constant pain, an inability to walk, taking the best part of an hour to walk up one flight of stairs. I thought I was disabled before that point but I had no idea things were so bad until they happened. Being the headstrong, determined (some might say stubborn) person I am I tried to battle through until I couldn’t any longer. I was on the waiting list to see a young hip consultant at that time although things were moving very slowly, no pun intended, and I was still living on my own in my flat up one flight of stairs.

After speaking, or should that be crying due to the pain, to a friend of mine I phoned Occupational Therapy where I spoke to an individual who I will not name who demanded that I agree that others were worse off than myself as others had cancer not just not being able to move and as I was young she had other priorities unless I was mentally unwell or planning to hurt myself. Great that she asked about mental health but even if I had been the way I was spoken to I don’t think I would have confided in her even if I had been. I felt so bad at that stage that I had dared to trouble her with my worries over my health but had no idea where to turn. Things as it happened were removed from my hands because the next morning I woke up and couldn’t move at all. I phoned NHS24 and spoke to a lovely woman who understood the pain I was in and got an appointment at the local hospital for the out of hours GP. Several hours later I was hooked up on very strong pain medication and was able to be discharged into my parents care.

Its now around eight weeks later and I’ve been treated at my parents doctor as a temporary patient, been in and out of hospitals, been regularly seen by a physiotherapist and have now seen the consultant I had previously waited a year to see. My parents live around 50 miles away from home and the treatment I have received has been so remarkably different from that I received while in my own home. I have been treated as an individual rather than a hassle and sadly I really understand the meaning of Postcode Lottery now. I should also mention I also had an emergency appointment with another Occupational Therapist where I was seen by a person who was aghast that a colleague could have completely disregarded me simply due to my age and has arranged for physical assistance including a bath lift to allow me to wash! Not being able to wash or look after yourself has such an impact on your mental health so I’m so thankful for her understanding.

I’ve learned so many lessons during this time. Namely that it is not ok to be treated as less than human and this has made me even more determined to stand for Council elections next year. I never, ever, want anyone to feel as bad as I felt when asking for help which was much needed. Secondly that mental health and physical health are so intrinsically linked. My physical health being so bad and not being able to do basic tasks like wash had such an impact on my mental health. If it wasn’t for good friends and family who I was able to cry to when things were bad I don’t think I would have had the energy to battle my physical condition. This make me determined to continue to fight against any cuts to services and to continue to speak out for mental health. It really can impact on anyone. Thirdly that even although I consider myself to be well aware of the lives of disabled people there really is no better marker than lived experience hence I promise to continue to ask disabled people their own stories and how I can best help them and to never assume that because two people have the same physical condition that they will both be impacted the same way. People are individuals and deserve to be treated as such. Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, to campaign as much as I can possibly can to remove barriers to care and health for all people regardless of where they happen to live.

The past few months have been difficult for myself but I have been able to take lessons from these and I promise that these will be central to my election campaign and beyond. Disabled people do matter and we need to ensure that this is the case in all aspects of life and politics.

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/postcode-lottery/feed/ 0
Our society forces disabled people to be superhuman — Paralympian or not https://www.oneinfive.scot/our-society-forces-disabled-people-to-be-superhuman-paralympian-or-not/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/our-society-forces-disabled-people-to-be-superhuman-paralympian-or-not/#respond Sun, 02 Oct 2016 09:10:10 +0000 http://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=320 By Gordon Aikman
 
Bang! Two players collide, head-on, at speed. Wheelchair basketball is fast and ferocious. The players tear around the court, crash and are regularly thrown to the floor. I feel myself nudging my wheelchair closer and closer to the TV screen. Adrenaline coursing through my body, I am taken back to my childhood. For a second I am there on the court, screeching down the line, ready for a pass.
 
Knock, knock. “Hello.” I am rapidly returned to reality, as my carer arrives to take me to the loo.
 
As the Paralympic GB gold rush began, my admiration grew and grew, but I couldn’t help but feel frustrated and more disabled than ever. This is new. I don’t begrudge able-bodied people who walk, run or cycle past me in the street. I wonder, with a deep pang of guilt, why do I feel like this?
 
Sitting at home I am forced to confront how increasingly powerless I am over my own body, and how surprisingly tough it is to watch those who look and feel a bit like you, but are far more capable. I tell my limbs what to do but they rarely listen.
 
No amount of training can strengthen my muscles that have already wasted away. Men and woman smashing world records versus me zonked after eating breakfast. I know it is irrational, but I cannot help but feel like a failure.
 
While we can all be described as disabled, what that word means for different people varies immensely. There is no norm. And given one-fifth of the UK population has some sort of — visible or invisible — disability, those that ran, swam and cycled their way to victory are very much the exception.
 
Every four years the Paralympic Games shine a light on disability. That global profile offers a golden opportunity to inform and change attitudes. While we have come a long way from the days of exiling disabled people, it is hard to believe that it was 2004 before live coverage of the Paralympics was broadcast in the UK. Progress, but still a way to go.
 
So first, the positives. Recent years have witnessed a step change in the quantity of media coverage. With more than 120 hours of sport televised live from Rio (700 hours if you include online content), it was the biggest overseas broadcast in Paralympic — and Channel 4 — history. That is a lot of disability-positive screen time.
 
To deliver the programming a record number of disabled people were employed both on and off screen. About 58% of presenters were disabled. That should, of course, be a no-brainer. If you want people who understand disability, hire disabled people. Another welcome development was the 8pm prime-time billing for The Last Leg: Live from Rio, a cheeky and irreverent comedy chat show which brought the Paralympics to a record number of younger viewers.
 
Even if you missed the Paralympics, you would have struggled to avoid Channel 4’s trailer, We’re the Superhumans. The three-minute ad, shared extensively across social media, was viewed millions of times. For most this will have been their only interaction with the Games, so it really does matter. Set to the Sammy Davis Jr track Yes I Can, it showcases dozens of Paralympians in action who chant #YesICan throughout. Great . . . if only it were as simple as that.
 
It is not a lack of willpower standing between me and the 100 metres; it is the fact that my legs packed in when I was 29. The narrative implies disabled people can do anything if we just tried that bit harder, lazybones.
 
Launching the ad online, Channel 4 tell us: “There’s no such thing as can’t.” But the thing is, there is. Disability inevitably means accepting the can’ts. As motor neurone disease progressively paralyses my body, I must constantly adapt to life within ever greater limits. It is my reality. To pretend any different would get in the way of enjoying the things I can do.
 
And while branding Paralympians as “superhuman” might seem positive, it unhelpfully suggests success equals beating disability. It paints a partial, rose-tinted picture of what it really means to be disabled. The reality is all disabled people are forced to be superhuman — Paralympian or not — because of the inaccessible world and anti-disabled attitudes we must battle every day simply to exist. The taxi driver who refuses to pick you up because you are in a wheelchair. The restaurant up a flight of stairs. The pub with no accessible loo. Day after day, that takes record-breaking resilience.
 
It is time for a new narrative. We get the body we are given and no amount of positive thinking or screaming “Yes I can” will change that — boy, I wish it could.
 
Let’s stop portraying disability as something that has to be conquered. Let’s remember that it takes superhuman levels of strength to accept what you cannot do. And let’s start a new story where success comes in many shapes and forms, and where the onus is on society to tear down the barriers that disable us.
 
As for Tokyo 2020, forgive me, #NoICant — and that’s just fine.
 
 
Gordon Aikman is a motor neurone disease patient, campaigner and One in Five ambassador. 
 
To donate to his campaign to fund research into a cure for MND, text MNDS85 £5 to 70070 or visit http://www.gordonsfightback.com
 
This article in The Sunday Times on 2 October 2016. 
 
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/our-society-forces-disabled-people-to-be-superhuman-paralympian-or-not-crjmxtcpk
]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/our-society-forces-disabled-people-to-be-superhuman-paralympian-or-not/feed/ 0
Making An Impact https://www.oneinfive.scot/making-an-impact/ https://www.oneinfive.scot/making-an-impact/#respond Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:15:28 +0000 http://www.oneinfive.scot/?p=316 By Councillor John Cairney, South Lanarkshire Council

I was first elected as a councillor in 2007 just two years after being officially registered as blind. It was the third time I had run for office and losing my sight did lead me to rethink my campaign strategy around purely practical considerations.

Whether that change of tactics was significant in my success I could not say but I do know that similar practical considerations have, I feel, benefited me in my day to day work as a councillor for instance I tend to avoid email exchanges and always ask people to phone me to chat about issues.

I use text to speech devices but it is faster and easier to speak and while that is a situation that my disability forced on me I do think it is a better way of doing business, email messages can get lost in translation or misunderstood and misinterpreted but chatting to someone it is easier to really grasp the nub of their concern and explain what you can and cannot do to help.

As another example after losing my sight I found some traditional campaign techniques difficult I couldn’t go round the doors or read a long list of telephone numbers to canvass by phone so instead I put together a personal leaflet and paid for a local distribution company to hand deliver it.

I have been a councillor for nine years now, my fellow elected members from all parties and the council staff have been very willing to offer support and help but I can’t deny it has been a learning process for us all.

As soon as I took office I was asked what aids and adaptations would help me take on the duties and responsibilities of the role but I honestly could not say.  I had never been a councillor before so couldn’t say what might work best.

Conversely I was South Lanarkshire’s first blind elected member so there was no precedent for what support would work generally and what would work specifically for me.

What was however available in abundance was a willingness to work with me, and me with others, and with a bit of research and trial and error we got there, while what suits me may not work for others I hope my experience can help those on a similar path in the future.

I would say to anyone with a disability don’t let it put you off taking a role in public life but be prepared to speak up about barriers you find in your way and to work with others to get by them. There isn’t a one size fits all solution ready and waiting but there is definitely a willingness and desire to find your solution.

Digital technology has made a big difference and with the support of a technically minded council officer I have an iPad and iPhone configured with the best fonts and background colours to make the most of the three percent vision I still retain.

The Siri speech function is invaluable albeit a little one way as it struggles with my broad Glasgow accent.

On the other hand I have made no bones about asking for help from the people around me if I need assistance.

I chair a committee and because I can’t see if a member has their hand raised to make a point or ask a question we have developed a system where someone will give me a tap on the hand to make sure I am aware.

We also have a system in place when the committee documents are published a member of the office team will read through them with me. This is really helpful as they are able to jump to specific sections and go backwards and forwards through the text at my request much more easily than I could with an eReader device – something I use a lot outwith the office as I love books.

Although I lost an eye in an industrial accident in my twenties I had no issues until I was in my       mid-fifties when almost overnight I went from driving a car to being registered blind after suffering a detached retina which ultimately could not be repaired.

It was obviously quite a blow but I knew the best recovery was to not give in. I had been involved in political campaigning for forty years and after serving as a councillor for nine years I do believe being blind allows me to bring something extra to discussions with fellow elected members and the wider community in particular when we are dealing with matters involving disability I can bring a ‘been there and got the t-shirt’ attitude which can help cut to the chase.

On a final note I would be lying if I tried to pretend my forty years of political activism hadn’t been helpful but I do believe that even those who are new to the game, as you might say, can make an impact if they have a real passion to fight for what they believe in and a genuine belief that they have a contribution to make regardless of any disability or perhaps because of it.

]]>
https://www.oneinfive.scot/making-an-impact/feed/ 0